From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2004
5 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2000-11486.

Decided March 8, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered December 7, 2000, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ethel P. Ross, Rye, N.Y., for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the County Court properly denied his motion to suppress his inculpatory statements to law enforcement officials. The credible evidence adduced at the Huntley hearing ( see People v. Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72) established that the defendant's oral and written statements were made after the defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his constitutional rights, and his videotaped statement was taken after he again waived his rights ( see People v. Jackson, 308 A.D.2d 549, lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 540; People v. Hunter, 265 A.D.2d 503).

The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced at trial is not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

S. MILLER, J.P., LUCIANO, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 2004
5 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. STEVIE P. ROBINSON, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 586

Citing Cases

Robinson v. MSG Entm't Grp.

Id. ¶¶ 15, 31; see People v. Robinson, 772 N.Y.S.2d 586 (2d Dep't 2004), lv. denied, 3 N.Y.3d 646 (N.Y.…

People v. Robinson

June 23, 2004. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 5 AD3d 508 (Dutchess). Application in criminal case for leave to…