From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2009
58 A.D.3d 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2007-09863.

January 27, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), rendered October 4, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel; Pamela Blandino on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Fisher, Florio, Carni and Eng, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing or voluntary because the court failed to elicit from him a waiver of his right to a ruling on his pending motion to suppress evidence is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v LeGrady, 50 AD3d 1059; People v Ramsey, 49 AD3d 565; People v Herdt, 45 AD3d 698) and, in any event, is refuted by the record ( see People v Boston, 30 AD3d 211; People v Kenrick, 233 AD2d 528).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2009
58 A.D.3d 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARTHUR RICHARDSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2009

Citations

58 A.D.3d 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 568
870 N.Y.S.2d 925