From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kenrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1996
233 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 25, 1996.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered May 16, 1995, convicting him of attempted kidnapping in the second degree and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Florio, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's current challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v Proctor, 79 NY2d 992; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, his contention is unequivocally refuted by the record of the plea proceedings ( see, e.g., People v Santana, 176 AD2d 360), which demonstrates that his plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered ( see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

The defendant has foreclosed appellate review of his claim that his statutory right to a speedy trial was violated ( see, CPL 30.30) by entering a plea of guilty ( see, People v Prescott, 66 NY2d 216, 219-220; People v Howe, 56 NY2d 622).


Summaries of

People v. Kenrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1996
233 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Kenrick

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH KENRICK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 528 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 973

Citing Cases

People v. Richardson

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing or voluntary because the court failed to…

People v. Holmes

60; People v. Dickerson, 163 A.D.2d 610). The defendant's claims of coercion and ineffectiveness of counsel,…