From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Philpot

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 24, 2012
99 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-24

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Larry PHILPOT, appellant.

Michael G. Paul, New City, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.


Michael G. Paul, New City, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered October 11, 2011, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court adhered to the terms and conditions of the plea agreement. An objective reading of the plea agreement demonstrates that its terms were complied with, and the defendant's misinterpretation of the agreement, or his disappointment with his sentence, does not suffice as a reason for vacating his plea of guilty ( see People v. Cataldo, 39 N.Y.2d 578, 579–580, 384 N.Y.S.2d 763, 349 N.E.2d 863;People v. Rodriguez, 98 A.D.3d 693, 950 N.Y.S.2d 279;People v. Hulsey, 244 A.D.2d 358, 359, 665 N.Y.S.2d 326;People v. Martin, 235 A.D.2d 551, 653 N.Y.S.2d 863;People v. Davis, 161 A.D.2d 787, 788, 556 N.Y.S.2d 664;People v. Welch, 129 A.D.2d 752, 514 N.Y.S.2d 513).

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. His argument that, at sentencing, his attorney “did little” to attempt to obtain a sentence less than the one actually imposed, is belied by the record. Furthermore, the defendant received an advantageous plea and the record does not cast doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel ( see People v. Henry, 95 N.Y.2d 563, 566, 721 N.Y.S.2d 577, 744 N.E.2d 112;People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 404, 633 N.Y.S.2d 270, 657 N.E.2d 265;People v. Moss, 74 A.D.3d 1360, 903 N.Y.S.2d 265;People v. Garrett, 68 A.D.3d 781, 782, 888 N.Y.S.2d 908;People v. Boodhoo, 191 A.D.2d 448, 449, 593 N.Y.S.2d 882).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

DILLON, J.P., HALL, ROMAN and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Philpot

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 24, 2012
99 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Philpot

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Larry PHILPOT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 24, 2012

Citations

99 A.D.3d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7134
952 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

People v. Keith

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at the sentencing proceeding. The…

People v. Keith

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel at the sentencing proceeding. The…