From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hulsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1997
244 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 3, 1997

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court did not err in summarily denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea. Given the clear and unequivocal nature of the plea agreement as set forth at the plea allocution, and the court's adherence thereto, the defendant's subjective interpretation of the agreement is belied by both the heavily-negotiated nature of the plea agreement and several express statements made at the plea allocution ( see, People v. Cataldo, 39 N.Y.2d 578; People v. Breeden, 221 A.D.2d 352).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hulsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1997
244 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Hulsey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS HULSEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 326

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

At sentencing, after defense counsel spoke on the defendant's behalf and the defendant made a statement on…

People v. Philpot

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court adhered to the terms and conditions of the plea…