From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pennington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1975
47 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

April 28, 1975


Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed April 10, 1973, upon a plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree. The sentence was an indeterminate prison term of a maximum of 10 years. Sentence reversed, on the law, and case remanded to Criminal Term for resentence in accordance with the views herein set forth. Prior to the imposition of sentence, defendant was asked only whether there was any legal cause why the judgment of the court should not be pronounced upon him. The allocution requirement set forth in CPL 380.50 is not satisfied by such inquiry (People v Cummings, 45 A.D.2d 763). We do not find the sentence to be excessive. Latham, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pennington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 28, 1975
47 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

People v. Pennington

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY PENNINGTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1975

Citations

47 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

People v. Willbright

Defendant also contends that, at his sentencing, the allocution requirement of CPL 380.50 was not met. The…

People v. Mentesana

Motion by appellant for reargument of his appeal from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed…