From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1974
45 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

June 24, 1974


Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed November 16, 1972 upon a conviction of attempted criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree, upon a guilty plea. The sentence was an indeterminate prison term of not more than four years. Sentence reversed, on the law, and case remanded to the Criminal Term for resentence in accordance with the views herein set forth. CPL 380.50 requires that the court not only make a statement at the time of sentence, but that the court ask the defendant whether he wishes to make a statement. This must be done ( People v. Gilliam, 40 A.D.2d 1036; People v. Brown, 41 A.D.2d 850). The statutory requirement is not satisfied by asking the defendant whether he has any legal reason why sentence should not be pronounced. Hopkins, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1974
45 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Cummings

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. BENNIE CUMMINGS, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1974

Citations

45 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

People v. Willbright

Defendant also contends that, at his sentencing, the allocution requirement of CPL 380.50 was not met. The…

People v. Pennington

Prior to the imposition of sentence, defendant was asked only whether there was any legal cause why the…