From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 9, 2023
216 A.D.3d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

216 Ind. No. 633/11 Case No. 2015-01963

05-09-2023

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lloyd PARKS, Defendant–Appellant.

Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Jonathan Sclar of counsel), for respondent.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven R. Berko of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Jonathan Sclar of counsel), for respondent.

Webber, J.P., Kern, Friedman, Mendez, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about April 8, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supported the assessment of 15 points for defendant's history of substance abuse. Defendant used marijuana on a daily basis, which is a recognized form of substance abuse for purposes of this risk factor (see People v. Nieves, 179 A.D.3d 849, 113 N.Y.S.3d 900 [2d Dept. 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 906, 2020 WL 3096961 [2020] ; see also People v. Padilla, 116 A.D.3d 566, 567, 983 N.Y.S.2d 725 [1st Dept. 2014], lv denied 24 N.Y.3d 902, 2014 WL 4357481 [2014] ). Clear and convincing evidence also supported the assessment of 10 points for unsatisfactory conduct while confined, based on defendant's three Tier II infractions and his Tier III violation approximately 11 months before his sex offender adjudication (see People v. Morales, 157 A.D.3d 475, 475, 66 N.Y.S.3d 432 [1st Dept. 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 903, 2018 WL 1597558 [2018] ).

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). The allegedly mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by aggravating factors.


Summaries of

People v. Parks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 9, 2023
216 A.D.3d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Parks

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lloyd PARKS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 9, 2023

Citations

216 A.D.3d 462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
189 N.Y.S.3d 112

Citing Cases

People v. Feldmeth

The court properly assessed points under the risk factor for a history of substance abuse, given defendant's…