From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morales

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 9, 2018
157 A.D.3d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

5412 Ind. 1987/13

01-09-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel MORALES, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Joshua P. Weiss of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adrienne M. Gantt of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Joshua P. Weiss of counsel), for respondent.

Tom, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Oing, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about November 18, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly assessed 10 points for unsatisfactory conduct while confined, based on defendant's two recent Tier III disciplinary infractions. These serious infractions were not remote in time, and the record fails to support defendant's remaining arguments against this assessment. Defendant's argument that the court improperly assessed 15 points for failure to accept responsibility is unpreserved and unavailing.

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant's request for a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). There were no mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account in the risk assessment instrument or that outweighed the seriousness of the underlying offense, which was committed against a child. The probative value of defendant's low Static–99 score test is limited because that assessment does not take into account the nature of the sexual contact with the victim or the potential harm that could be caused by reoffense (see People v. Roldan, 140 A.D.3d 411, 412, 30 N.Y.S.3d 871 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 904, 2016 WL 5001245 [2016] ).


Summaries of

People v. Morales

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 9, 2018
157 A.D.3d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Morales

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel MORALES…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 9, 2018

Citations

157 A.D.3d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 114
66 N.Y.S.3d 432

Citing Cases

People v. Parks

Defendant used marijuana on a daily basis, which is a recognized form of substance abuse for purposes of this…

People v. Parks

Defendant used marijuana on a daily basis, which is a recognized form of substance abuse for purposes of this…