From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McHale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 27, 1990
165 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 27, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.).


Defendant, no stranger to the criminal justice system, pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree. Defendant's claim that the court failed to exercise its discretion at sentencing has not been preserved as a matter of law for our review. Defendant did not move to set aside the plea bargain on this ground. We also find no merit to defendant's claim that his sentence is excessive. The lesser sentence received by defendant's younger brother does not establish that defendant's sentence is unreasonable. Defendant's background and record fully support the sentence defendant received.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sullivan, Carro and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. McHale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 27, 1990
165 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. McHale

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN McHALE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
564 N.Y.S.2d 60

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The defendant's contention that the resentencing court improperly failed to sentence him de novo is…

People v. Killiebrew

The defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310,…