From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Killiebrew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-01697.

June 23, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), imposed December 10, 2007, upon his conviction of assault in the first degree and burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict.

Before Santucci, J.P., Covello, Leventhal and Belen, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the resentencing court improperly failed to exercise its sentencing discretion to reconsider the sentence as a whole, in that the court should have considered whether the duration of the terms of imprisonment originally imposed on his conviction of assault in the first degree and burglary in the first degree were still appropriate in light of the fact that periods of postrelease supervision would be imposed. The defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 315-316; People v Marshall, 228 AD2d 15, 17-18; cf. People v D'Avila, 21 AD3d 905; People v McHale, 165 AD2d 800), and, in any event, is without merit ( see People v Stewartson, 63 AD3d 966 [2nd Dept 2009]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

[ See 2007 NY Slip Op 33794(U).]


Summaries of

People v. Killiebrew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Killiebrew

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHELDON KILLIEBREW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
880 N.Y.S.2d 564

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

The defendant's contention that the resentencing court improperly failed to sentence him de novo is…