From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Manuel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 10, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.).


The People's claim that there was reasonable suspicion to pat down the area where the officer observed an undefined bulge is unpreserved for review as a matter of law ( People v. Parris, 83 N.Y.2d 342, 351), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. If we were to review, we would find that the search was not justified. The police lawfully approached a taxicab in order to inform the driver that his brake lights were inoperable. Defendant was seated in the center of the rear passenger seat and glanced to his right upon the approach of the police, who observed a large bulge underneath defendant's shirt, above the belt line of his pants. As the police acknowledged, there was no indication that the bulge was a weapon. Nonetheless, one of the police officers opened the car door and reached directly towards the bulge. During a fifteen second struggle involving the officers and defendant, one of the officers felt a hard object and subsequently removed a kilogram package of drugs from underneath defendant's shirt. Under these circumstances, there was no reasonable basis to believe that defendant was armed ( People v. Robbins, 83 N.Y.2d 928, 930).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Manuel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 10, 1995
220 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Manuel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. JOSE MANUEL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 263 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 86

Citing Cases

People v. Hall

Mere hunch' or gut reaction' will not do. This Court has specifically held that the mere fact that an officer…

In re Jaquan M.

Mere ‘hunch’ or ‘gut reaction’ will not do” ( People v. Sobotker, 43 N.Y.2d 559, 564, 402 N.Y.S.2d 993, 373…