From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Karney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 1990
160 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

April 30, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Savarese, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the defendant's motion is granted to the extent that the sentence is reduced to an indeterminate term of from 4 1/2 to 9 years' imprisonment. The defendant is to be delivered to the appropriate New Jersey official forthwith so that he may begin serving his sentence in that State.

Pursuant to the plea bargain negotiations, the defendant's sentence was to run concurrent with the remainder of an undischarged term for which the defendant was still responsible in New Jersey. Since the defendant was not returned to custody in New Jersey, his New York sentence did not begin to run (see, Penal Law § 70.30 [2-a]; § 70.20 [3]).

Accordingly, we have directed that the defendant be returned to the custody of New Jersey forthwith, so that the sentence imposed may be effectuated (see, People v. Harbin, 76 A.D.2d 889; People v. Brown, 63 A.D.2d 988). Since the defendant has already been incarcerated in New York for a period of time greater than the applicable minimum permissible sentence (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [b]; [3] [b]), we reduce the sentence to the minimum permissible sentence of 4 1/2 to 9 years' imprisonment. We do not find the sentence otherwise excessive. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Karney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 1990
160 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Karney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM KARNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
554 N.Y.S.2d 734