From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1978
63 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

June 12, 1978


Appeal by defendant (by permission) from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated March 17, 1977, denying his motion, inter alia, to vacate his judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 (subd 1, par [b]). Order modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision directing that defendant be delivered to the appropriate Massachusetts official forthwith so that he may begin serving his sentence in that State. As so modified, order affirmed. At the time defendant entered his plea, and again at the time of sentencing, the court directed that the sentence imposed was to run concurrently with the remainder of the undischarged term for which defendant was still responsible in Massachusetts. However, the remainder of the Massachusetts sentence cannot begin to run until defendant is delivered to the appropriate Massachusetts authorities (see Penal Law, § 70.30, subd 2-a). Accordingly, we have directed that defendant be returned to the custody of Massachusetts forthwith so that the sentence imposed may be effectuated. Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone, Shapiro and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1978
63 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IVAN WALLACE BROWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1978

Citations

63 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

People v. Karney

Pursuant to the plea bargain negotiations, the defendant's sentence was to run concurrent with the remainder…

People v. Harbin

As so modified, judgments affirmed and the defendant is to be delivered to the appropriate Alabama official…