From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Clyde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 85 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 12, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard C. Failla, J.).


The record supports the hearing court's determination that defendant's observed actions, which consisted merely of looking around the Port Authority Bus Terminal as he prepared to board a bus, did not provide a founded suspicion that criminality was afoot, so as to warrant the arresting officer's acknowledged deliberate questioning of defendant intended to elicit an incriminating response (People v Boyd, 188 A.D.2d 239, lv withdrawn 81 N.Y.2d 967).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Clyde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1994
203 A.D.2d 85 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Clyde

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. BRYAN CLYDE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 85 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 1

Citing Cases

People v. Keita

A level-two common-law inquiry, therefore, may involve extended, invasive, and accusatory questions aimed a…

People v. Keita

A level-two common-law inquiry, therefore, may involve extended, invasive, and accusatory questions aimed a…