From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 2, 1990

Appeal from the Erie County Court, D'Amico, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, following a bench trial, of burglary in the third degree for illegally entering a locked basement storage room with the intent to steal some tools. He contends that the proof was legally insufficient and that his sentence was harsh and excessive. There is no merit to either contention. There was testimony from which the trier of fact could find that defendant had no lawful right to be present in the utility room, that he entered the utility room with the intent to steal tools, and that his intoxication was insufficient to negate the requisite intent (see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495; People v Scott, 111 A.D.2d 45, 46).


Summaries of

People v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 2, 1990
158 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD BURNS, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 2, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
551 N.Y.S.2d 432

Citing Cases

Green v. Herbert

See, e.g., People v. Miller, 174 A.D.2d 901, 903, 571 N.Y.S.2d 597, 599 (3d Dep't 1991); People v. Martin,…

Caston v. Costello

Although the contemporaneous objection rule often bars Batson claims, it is regularly invoked only when those…