From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pena v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2011
82 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-01328.

March 1, 2011.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered January 12, 2010, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Mark W. Blanchard, Corporation Counsel, Yonkers, N.Y. (Michael Levinson of counsel), for appellant.

Scott Baron Associates, P.C., Howard Beach, N.Y. (W. Bradford Bernadt of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Covello, J.P., Chambers, Lott and Cohen, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The infant plaintiff allegedly was injured when her right foot came into contact with a piece of metal protruding from the grassy area of a public sidewalk.

The defendant, City of Yonkers, established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence sufficient to demonstrate that it did not have prior written notice of the alleged defect ( see Charter of City of Yonkers § C24-11; Lawler v City of Yonkers, 45 AD3d 813; Rochford v City of Yonkers, 12 AD3d 433). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact because they offered only speculation that the defendant created the alleged defect ( see Patti v Town of N. Hempstead, 23 AD3d 362; Regan v City of New York, 8 AD3d 462). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.


Summaries of

Pena v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2011
82 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Pena v. City of Yonkers

Case Details

Full title:JASMIN PENA, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, ELIZABETH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 728 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1632
917 N.Y.S.2d 903

Citing Cases

Vaisman v. Vill. of Croton-On-Hudson

This comports with the reality that municipal officials are not aware of every dangerous condition on its…

Gil v. City of N.Y.

Here, the City established, prima facie, that it did not have prior written notice of the sidewalk sign post…