From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pansmith v. Incorporated Village of Island Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1946
271 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

November 25, 1946.


Appeal from order denying defendants' motion under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is insufficient in law. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Defendants' time to answer is extended until ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The complaint contains three causes of action. If any one of them is sufficient the motion was properly denied. ( Halstead v. General Ry. Signal Co., 268 App. Div. 1060; Adreance v. Lorentzen, 269 App. Div. 987; Allcock v. Cohen, 269 App. Div. 1050.) As a matter of mere pleading the complaint is sufficient in law. Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pansmith v. Incorporated Village of Island Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1946
271 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Pansmith v. Incorporated Village of Island Park

Case Details

Full title:JOHN B. PANSMITH et al., Respondents, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF ISLAND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1946

Citations

271 App. Div. 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Ferrare

heir customers by monopolizing telephone lines of the sponsors; and (c). Threatening sponsors with ruin of…

Sullivan v. Sullivan

The appellant, in effect, so concedes. She presses her appeal only in respect of the cause of action seeking…