From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nolletti v. Nolletti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 2003
2 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2003-00345, 2003-02774.

December 1, 2003.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from (1) an order of protection of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated January 6, 2003, which, upon the filing by the plaintiff wife of a family offense petition with the Family Court, and the referral of that petition to the Supreme Court, and after a hearing, inter alia, directed him to vacate the marital residence, and (2) so much of an order of the same court entered February 14, 2003, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), or to compel the plaintiff wife to provide a more definite statement of her allegations.

Robert S. Michaels, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Gavin I. Handwerker of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph J.A. Tringali, Sr. (Domenick J. Porco, Scarsdale, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent.

Before: BARRY A. COZIER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order dated January 6, 2003, is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order entered February 14, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff wife.

Contrary to the husband's contention, the allegations contained in the complaint were sufficient to state a cause of action for divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment ( see Wanser v. Wanser, 214 A.D.2d 611, 612; Hirschhorn v. Hirschhorn, 194 A.D.2d 768; Horvath v. Horvath, 177 A.D.2d 617, 618). Furthermore, the allegations sufficiently apprised the husband of the accusations against him so as to enable him to prepare a defense ( see Pfeil v. Pfeil, 100 A.D.2d 725; Kapchan v. Kapchan, 104 A.D.2d 358, 359; McKilligan v. McKilligan, 156 A.D.2d 904, 907).

Moreover, under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly issued an order of protection ( see Family Ct Act § 812; Matter of Amy Cohen L. v. Howard N.L., 222 A.D.2d 677).

The husband's remaining contentions are without merit.

KRAUSMAN, J.P., McGINITY, COZIER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nolletti v. Nolletti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 2003
2 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Nolletti v. Nolletti

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER NOLLETTI, Respondent, v. DAVID NOLLETTI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 810

Citing Cases

Gianis v. Gianis

Moreover, the plaintiff also submitted an affidavit in opposition to the defendant's motion, in which she…

Maybaum v. Maybaum

Further, the Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was pursuant to CPLR…