From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Cohen v. Howard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, Suffolk County (McElligott, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence adduced at the hearing demonstrated that the granting of an order of protection was not improper (see, Merola v Merola, 146 A.D.2d 611; Kilmer v Kilmer, 109 A.D.2d 1004; Matter of Leffingwell v Leffingwell, 86 A.D.2d 929). The record amply demonstrates that the husband conducted himself in an offensive and frightening manner toward the wife. Thus, it is clear that an order directing him to stay away from the marital residence was reasonably necessary to provide meaningful protection and to eliminate the root of the family disturbance (see, Matter of Greene v Greene, 216 A.D.2d 393; Matter of Brown v Brown, 185 A.D.2d 812; Matter of Leffingwell v Leffingwell, supra). Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Cohen v. Howard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Cohen v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AMY COHEN L., Respondent, v. HOWARD N.L., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 654

Citing Cases

Nolletti v. Nolletti

Contrary to the husband's contention, the allegations contained in the complaint were sufficient to state a…

In the Matter of Dell'isola v. Dell'isola

The testimony proffered at the hearing in the Family Court established, by a preponderance of the evidence,…