From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Vitek

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original
Jun 28, 1974
321 A.2d 570 (N.H. 1974)

Opinion

No. 6896

Decided June 28, 1974

1. A person indicted for murder may be convicted of manslaughter as a lesser included offense of murder without being specifically indicted for the offense of manslaughter.

George L. O'Malley, by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

Warren B. Rudman, attorney general, and David W. Hess, assistant attorney general (Mr. Hess orally), for the defendant.


This petitioner for habeas corpus seeks his liberty on the ground that his conviction for manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser included offense of murder for which he was indicted violated his constitutional and statutory (RSA 601:1) right not to be tried and convicted of the offense of manslaughter without being specifically indicted therefor.

There is no question but that manslaughter is a lesser included offense of murder. The indictment for murder contains all the allegations essential to constitute a charge of manslaughter. State v. Butman, 42 N.H. 490 (1861); State v. Zelichowski, 52 N.J. 377, 245 A.2d 351 (1968).

Petition denied.


Summaries of

Nichols v. Vitek

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original
Jun 28, 1974
321 A.2d 570 (N.H. 1974)
Case details for

Nichols v. Vitek

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD M. NICHOLS v. JOSEPH VITEK, WARDEN

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Original

Date published: Jun 28, 1974

Citations

321 A.2d 570 (N.H. 1974)
321 A.2d 570

Citing Cases

State v. McPhail

The indictment also includes lesser offenses such as aggravated assault. Nichols v. Vitek, 114 N.H. 453, 321…

State v. Conklin

In this respect, second-degree murder as defined by RSA 585:1, like manslaughter, constituted a lesser…