From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Brojaj

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2014
114 A.D.3d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-27

In re NATIONAL CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Bashkim BROJAJ, etc., Respondent–Appellant.

Raphaelson & Levine Law Firm, P.C., New York (Gencian Gjoni of counsel), for appellant. Adams, Hanson, Rego, Carlin, Kaplan & Fishbein, Yonkers (Michael A. Zarkower of counsel), for respondent.


Raphaelson & Levine Law Firm, P.C., New York (Gencian Gjoni of counsel), for appellant. Adams, Hanson, Rego, Carlin, Kaplan & Fishbein, Yonkers (Michael A. Zarkower of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J.), entered on or about December 6, 2012, which granted the petition for a permanent stay of arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court, based on the evidence presented at a framed issue hearing, concluded that there was no contact between the truck driven by respondent and an unidentified car. Respondent's testimony was not credited by Supreme Court and there is no basis to upset such finding ( see Travelers Prop. & Cas. Co. of Am. v. Mayen, 82 A.D.3d 402, 917 N.Y.S.2d 854). TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, SAXE, RICHTER, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nat'l Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Brojaj

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 27, 2014
114 A.D.3d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Nat'l Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Brojaj

Case Details

Full title:In re NATIONAL CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner–Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 27, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1392
980 N.Y.S.2d 765