From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Travelers Property and Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 2011
82 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4375.

March 1, 2011.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered June 11, 2009, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a framed-issue hearing, denied petitioner's application brought pursuant to CPLR article 75 seeking, inter alia, a permanent stay of arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Law Offices of Karen C. Dodson, New York (Andre Del Re of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of Jeffrey B. Manca, New York (Jeffrey B. Manca of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


Supreme Court properly denied the request for a permanent stay of arbitration, since petitioner failed to meet its burden of proof that a hit-and-run accident did not occur ( Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co. [GreaneyNational Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh], 156 AD2d 154, 155). The evidence adduced at the hearing, including the testimony of respondent's coworker who witnessed another vehicle hit respondent's car, showed that respondent was indeed involved in a hit-and-run accident ( see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Killakey, 78 NY2d 325). Although the police accident report indicated that respondent told the responding officer that the crash was the result of a blown out tire, the court reasonably attributed this statement to the fact that respondent was falling in and out of consciousness at the accident scene.


Summaries of

In re Travelers Property and Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 1, 2011
82 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Travelers Property and Casualty Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1516
917 N.Y.S.2d 854

Citing Cases

Nat'l Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Brojaj

Supreme Court, based on the evidence presented at a framed issue hearing, concluded that there was no contact…

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Armistead

To establish its entitlement to a permanent stay of arbitration, the insurer herein must meet it burden by…