From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Rozier

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 3, 1988
367 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

75174.

DECIDED MARCH 3, 1988.

Appeal dismissal. Pierce Superior Court. Before Judge Blount.

Francis Houston, Philip N. Golub, for appellant. Ronald B. Thomas, W. Vincent Settle III, for appellee.


Appellant-defendant has filed this direct appeal from the grant of appellee-plaintiff's motion for new trial. The grant of a motion for new trial is not a final order from which a direct appeal may be taken. See Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bishop, 170 Ga. App. 9 ( 316 S.E.2d 167) (1984); Days Inn of America v. Sharkey, 178 Ga. App. 718 ( 344 S.E.2d 518) (1986). Since appellant did not comply with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), this appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed. Banke, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 3, 1988.


Summaries of

Murray v. Rozier

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 3, 1988
367 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Murray v. Rozier

Case Details

Full title:MURRAY v. ROZIER

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 3, 1988

Citations

367 S.E.2d 886 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
367 S.E.2d 886

Citing Cases

Rockdale Awning v. Kerbow

2. Rockdale has also filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's order of January 14 granting plaintiffs…

Boyce v. Murray

The appellee filed a direct appeal to this court from that order, but that appeal was dismissed on the ground…