From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 27, 1984
316 S.E.2d 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

67424.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1984.

Action on policy. Floyd Superior Court. Before Judge Frazier.

Clayton H. Farnham, for appellant.

Bobby Lee Cook, L. Branch S. Connelly, for appellees.


This is an action on a fire insurance policy issued by appellant to appellees. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for appellant. Subsequently, the trial court granted appellees' motion for new trial, and this appeal followed.

"[A] judgment granting a new trial is not a final judgment . . ." Henderson v. Henderson, 231 Ga. 208 ( 200 S.E.2d 867). While "[t]he grant of a new trial on special grounds involving a question of law is reviewable in a proper appeal [cit.] . . ., we cannot reach the merits of appellant's contentions in this case [since] [n]o certificate of immediate review was obtained from the trial court nor application made to this court for interlocutory review. [Cits.]" Moore v. Williams, 163 Ga. App. 595 ( 295 S.E.2d 866); Young v. Warren, 155 Ga. App. 362 ( 270 S.E.2d 897); OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).

Appeal dismissed. McMurray, C. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1984.


Summaries of

Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 27, 1984
316 S.E.2d 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:COTTON STATES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BISHOP et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 27, 1984

Citations

316 S.E.2d 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
170 Ga. App. 9

Citing Cases

Murray v. Rozier

The grant of a motion for new trial is not a final order from which a direct appeal may be taken. See Cotton…