From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mungo v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2012
93 A.D.3d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-22

In the Matter of Marcus MUNGO, Petitioner, v. Norman BEZIO, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Marcus Mungo, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Marcus Mungo, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MERCURE, Acting P.J., SPAIN, MALONE JR., GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was being escorted to the bathroom area to provide a urine specimen for urinalysis testing when he punched an officer with a closed fist. During the ensuing physical altercation, petitioner continued to throw punches and was given several orders to cease such conduct, which he ignored. Other officers responded and petitioner was eventually placed in mechanical restraints. He was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with, among other things, assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, refusing a direct order and failing to comply with urinalysis testing procedures. He was found guilty of the charges at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence, consisting of the misbehavior report, related documentation and hearing testimony, supports the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Malik v. Bezio, 76 A.D.3d 1128, 1128, 908 N.Y.S.2d 138 [2010]; Matter of Martinez v. Selsky, 53 A.D.3d 989, 862 N.Y.S.2d 632 [2008] ). Petitioner's denial of wrongdoing and claim that he was assaulted by officers presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Cruz v. Fischer, 57 A.D.3d 1055, 867 N.Y.S.2d 709 [2008]; Matter of Jenkins v. Selsky, 51 A.D.3d 1239, 1240, 858 N.Y.S.2d 447 [2008] ). His remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review due to his failure to raise them either at the hearing or in his administrative appeal.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Mungo v. Bezio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 22, 2012
93 A.D.3d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Mungo v. Bezio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Marcus MUNGO, Petitioner, v. Norman BEZIO, as Director of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 22, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
940 N.Y.S.2d 696
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2146

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Fischer

The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding. We…

Wigfall v. Dep't of Corr. Servs.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony of the correction…