From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 31, 2008
53 A.D.3d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 502391.

July 31, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

David Martinez, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Kane, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur.


After a correction officer confiscated a soda can from his secured hospital room, petitioner struck the officer and became involved in a physical altercation. He was thereafter charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff and interfering with an employee. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, related documentation and testimony presented at the hearing provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Abdul-Khaliq v Goord, 34 AD3d 872, 872; Matter of Green v Goord, 26 AD3d 562, 563). While petitioner denied assaulting the officer, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Wilson v Goord, 23 AD3d 727). Moreover, we find no merit to petitioner's claim that he was improperly denied the testimony of an inmate witness inasmuch as this witness executed a written refusal form sufficiently explaining his absence ( see Matter of Hill v Selsky, 19 AD3d 64, 66-67; Matter of Claudio v Selsky, 4 AD3d 702, 703). Finally, petitioner's claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance is not substantiated by the record and, in any event, there has been no showing that he was prejudiced ( see Matter of White v Selsky, 3 AD3d 762, 763).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 31, 2008
53 A.D.3d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Martinez v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6474
862 N.Y.S.2d 632

Citing Cases

In re Cornwall

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the hearing testimony and documentary evidence, provide…

Warren v. Fischer

We are unpersuaded by petitioner's claim that he was improperly denied certain witnesses given that their…