From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moss v. Marymount Manhattan Coll.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2022
203 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

15456 Index No. 159291/16 595223/17 Case No. 2021–01389

03-08-2022

Maryann MOSS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. MARYMOUNT MANHATTAN COLLEGE, Defendant–Appellant. Marymount Manhattan College, Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Foliot Furniture Inc., doing business as "Meubles Foliot Inc. /Foliot Furniture Inc." et al., Third–Party Defendants–Respondents.

Biedermann Hoenig Semprevivo, PC, New York (Meishin Riccardulli of counsel), for appellant. Pollack Pollack Isaac & DeCicco, LLP (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for Maryann Moss, respondent. Haworth Barber & Gerstman, LLC, New York (Scott Haworth of counsel), for Foliot Furniture, Inc., Foliot Furniture Pacific Inc., and Foliot USA Holding Inc., respondents.


Biedermann Hoenig Semprevivo, PC, New York (Meishin Riccardulli of counsel), for appellant.

Pollack Pollack Isaac & DeCicco, LLP (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for Maryann Moss, respondent.

Haworth Barber & Gerstman, LLC, New York (Scott Haworth of counsel), for Foliot Furniture, Inc., Foliot Furniture Pacific Inc., and Foliot USA Holding Inc., respondents.

Kapnick, J.P., Gesmer, Oing, Singh, Scarpulla, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered December 3, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to establish prima facie that it was not negligent in connection with the injuries plaintiff sustained when she was climbing the ladder connected to a loft bed in her daughter's dorm room and the ladder swung out, causing her to fall (see Chapman v. City of New York, 139 A.D.3d 507, 30 N.Y.S.3d 542 [1st Dept. 2016] ). Defendant did not adequately address plaintiff's allegations that it had created the defective condition of the ladder and that it had actual notice of the condition. Nor did defendant establish that it did not have constructive notice of the alleged defective condition, since it failed to submit evidence showing when the ladder had last been inspected (see Mandel v. 340 Owners Corp., 189 A.D.3d 483, 484, 137 N.Y.S.3d 342 [1st Dept. 2020] ).

In any event, plaintiff presented evidence of defendant's constructive notice of the condition by submitting an expert's opinion, based on his inspection of the ladder and the testimony of plaintiff's daughter that the ladder made a metallic clinking sound every time she ascended and descended it, that the condition of the ladder preexisted the accident (see George v. New York City Tr. Auth., 41 A.D.3d 143, 143–144, 837 N.Y.S.2d 130 [1st Dept. 2007] ).


Summaries of

Moss v. Marymount Manhattan Coll.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 8, 2022
203 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Moss v. Marymount Manhattan Coll.

Case Details

Full title:Maryann MOSS, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. MARYMOUNT MANHATTAN COLLEGE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

203 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
160 N.Y.S.3d 860

Citing Cases

Ragoo v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

. Moreover, there are triable issues of fact as to whether defendants had constructive notice of the…

Pidoto v. BLDG P'ship

Moreover, defendants/third-party plaintiffs have failed to establish that they neither created nor had actual…