From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mandel v. 340 Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 8, 2020
189 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

12577 12577A Index No. 155169/17 Case No. 2020-00850

12-08-2020

Laura MANDEL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 340 OWNERS CORP., et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Blom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf, New York (Christopher J. Donadio of counsel), for appellant. Mauro Lilling Naparty, LLP, Woodbury (Anthony F. DeStefano of counsel), for respondents.


Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Blom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf, New York (Christopher J. Donadio of counsel), for appellant.

Mauro Lilling Naparty, LLP, Woodbury (Anthony F. DeStefano of counsel), for respondents.

Acosta, P.J., Gische, Oing, Gonza´lez, Kennedy, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (W. Franc Perry, J.), entered October 21, 2019, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about May 26, 2020, which denied plaintiff's motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Defendants' failure to establish prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law requires the denial of the motion regardless of the strength of plaintiff's opposition (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572 [1986] ). They failed to offer evidence of their inspection routines, including evidence regarding the last time the accident site was inspected (see Caban v. Bronx Park S. II Assoc., 142 A.D.3d 462, 36 N.Y.S.3d 600 [1st Dept. 2016] ).

In any event, plaintiff raises factual issues. Although plaintiff did not actually observe what caused her to trip and fall over an inclement weather runner in the lobby of defendants' building, her evidence, together with reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, including that she felt the toebox of her right foot slide under what felt to be a hump in the runner, causing her foot to get caught, and her to lose her balance and fall, sufficiently identified the cause of her fall (see Schneider v. Kings Hwy. Hosp. Ctr., 67 N.Y.2d 743, 500 N.Y.S.2d 95, 490 N.E.2d 1221 [1986] ; cf. Reeves v. 1700 First Ave. LLC, 142 A.D.3d 830, 37 N.Y.S.3d 262 [1st Dept. 2016] ).


Summaries of

Mandel v. 340 Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Dec 8, 2020
189 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Mandel v. 340 Owners Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Laura Mandel, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 340 Owners Corp., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 8, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
189 A.D.3d 483
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7316

Citing Cases

Nestenborg v. Standard Int'l Mgmt., LLC

Although defendants submitted testimony regarding their periodic preventive maintenance checks of the hotel…

Nestenborg v. Standard Int'l Mgmt.

Although defendants submitted testimony regarding their periodic preventive maintenance checks of the hotel…