In Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, 144 S.Ct. 2383 (2024), the Supreme Court emphasized that facial challenges to state laws are difficult to successfully mount.
Summary of this case from NetChoice, LLC v. Paxton22-277
02-16-2024
MOODY, ATT'Y GEN. OF FL, ET AL. v. NETCHOICE, LLC, ET AL.
ORDER
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
In Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, 144 S.Ct. 2383 (2024), the Supreme Court emphasized that facial challenges to state laws are difficult to successfully mount.
Summary of this case from NetChoice, LLC v. Paxtonstating that exercising editorial discretion in the selection and presentation of content is speech activity
Summary of this case from Kennedy v. Google LLCIn Moody, the Supreme Court dealt with separate challenges to new Texas and Florida social media laws that regulated online platforms' ability to engage in content moderation.
Summary of this case from Comput. & Commc'ns Indus. Ass'n v. PaxtonIn Moody v. Netchoice, the plaintiff mounted facial attacks against state laws recently passed in Florida and Texas that sought to regulate content moderation on social-media platforms.
Summary of this case from McAllister v. Clark Cnty.noting that, to properly analyze whether a law substantially burdens First Amendment activity, “a court must understand what kind of government actions the First Amendment prohibits”
Summary of this case from McAllister v. Clark Cnty.Full title:MOODY, ATT'Y GEN. OF FL, ET AL. v. NETCHOICE, LLC, ET AL.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Feb 16, 2024
To prevail on an overbreadth challenge in the First Amendment context, a party must demonstrate that "a…
Comput. & Commc'ns Indus. Ass'n v. Paxton(See Resp., Dkt, 18, at 19). Here, Paxton relies heavily on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Moody v.…