From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Millstone Point Co. v. Rutka

Superior Court, Hartford County
Nov 9, 1966
244 A.2d 829 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1966)

Opinion

File No. 146110

In the absence of statute, the state cannot be made a garnishee, nor can an officer of the state acting in his official capacity.

Memorandum filed November 9, 1966

Memorandum on plea in abatement. Plea sustained.

Day, Berry Howard, of Hartford, for the plaintiff.

Groobert Mahon, of Manchester, for all defendants.

Harold M. Mulvey, attorney general, and John K. Jepson, assistant attorney general, for the state, garnishee.

Courtney, Mansfield, Sullivan Ripley, of Hartford, for the defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.


The state of Connecticut filed a plea in abatement for the reason that the process is against the sovereign state of Connecticut or persons acting in their official capacity as officers of the state of Connecticut.

Stephenson, Connecticut Civil Procedure § 36(d), (e) and (f), pages 78 and 79, states that the rule in the United States is that the state cannot be made a garnishee. While no statute exists in Connecticut, it would be safe to assume that the rule obtains here in the absence of statutes authorizing procedures to allow the state to be garnishee.


Summaries of

Millstone Point Co. v. Rutka

Superior Court, Hartford County
Nov 9, 1966
244 A.2d 829 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1966)
Case details for

Millstone Point Co. v. Rutka

Case Details

Full title:THE MILLSTONE POINT COMPANY v. ANTHONY RUTKA, JR., ET AL

Court:Superior Court, Hartford County

Date published: Nov 9, 1966

Citations

244 A.2d 829 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1966)
27 Conn. Supp. 482

Citing Cases

Upshaw v. Nappier

Id., 821-22. In addition, the defendant cites Superior Court cases in which courts have held that sovereign…