From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miller-Frankel v. Frankel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 27, 2012
93 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-27

Joshua MILLER–FRANKEL, respondent, v. Larry FRANKEL, appellant.

Sheldon J. Tashman, P.C., New York, N.Y., for appellant. Andrew Greene & Associates, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (John V. D'Amico of counsel), for respondent.


Sheldon J. Tashman, P.C., New York, N.Y., for appellant. Andrew Greene & Associates, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (John V. D'Amico of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered August 9, 2011, which denied his motion, in effect, to change the venue of the action from Westchester County to New York County pursuant to CPLR 510(2).

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the defendant's motion, in effect, to change the venue of the action from Westchester County to New York County pursuant to CPLR 510(2) is granted, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries ( see CPLR 511[d] ).

To obtain a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510(2), a movant must produce admissible factual evidence demonstrating a strong possibility that an impartial trial cannot be obtained in the county where venue was properly placed ( see Matter of Michiel, 48 A.D.3d 687, 850 N.Y.S.2d 916; Jablonski v. Trost, 245 A.D.2d 338, 339, 665 N.Y.S.2d 438; Albanese v. West Nassau Mental Health Ctr., 208 A.D.2d 665, 666, 617 N.Y.S.2d 821). Under the circumstances of this case, including the evidence demonstrating a close familial relationship between the plaintiff and a Justice sitting in Westchester County, the protection of the court from even a possible appearance of impropriety requires a change of the venue of the action from Westchester County to New York County ( see Amann v. Caccese, 223 A.D.2d 663, 637 N.Y.S.2d 217; Burstein v. Greene, 61 A.D.2d 827, 402 N.Y.S.2d 227).

SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Miller-Frankel v. Frankel

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 27, 2012
93 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Miller-Frankel v. Frankel

Case Details

Full title:Joshua MILLER–FRANKEL, respondent, v. Larry FRANKEL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 27, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
940 N.Y.S.2d 878
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2287

Citing Cases

Cohen v. Sacchi

“To obtain a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510(2), a movant must produce admissible factual evidence…

Rutherford v. Patel

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately…