From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercury Casualty Company v. Flores

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 17, 2003
870 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-453.

Opinion filed December 17, 2003. Rehearing Denied April 16, 2004.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Leslie B. Rothenberg, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 01-453.

Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards O'Connor and Warren B. Kwavnick, for appellant.

Lopez Best and Virginia M. Best, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.


We affirm the judgment finding that the alleged error, if any, in the admission of the evidence was entirely harmless. See Soler v. Kukula, 297 So.2d 600, 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Hall v. Haldane, 268 So.2d 403, 404-05 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972).


Summaries of

Mercury Casualty Company v. Flores

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 17, 2003
870 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Mercury Casualty Company v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. CLARA FLORES, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 17, 2003

Citations

870 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Mercury Casualty Company v. Flores

Plaintiff-appellee Clara Flores sued her insurance company, defendant-appellant Mercury Casualty Company,…

Burgess Transp., Inc. v. Arostegui

Assuming any error on the evidentiary issues, we conclude that they were entirely harmless. See Mercury Cas.…