From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burgess Transp., Inc. v. Arostegui

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 11, 2004
882 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 3D03-2528.

August 11, 2004.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Roberto M. Pineiro, Judge.

Nicklaus Hyatt; Hicks Kneale and Dinah Stein and Gary Magnarini, Miami, for appellants.

Ratzan Alters; Kimberly L. Boldt, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and FLETCHER, JJ.


Burgess Transportation, Inc., Underwriters Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg appeal a final judgment after jury verdict in a wrongful death action.

We conclude that the trial court's evidentiary rulings were within the court's discretion. See State v. Nieto, 761 So.2d 467, 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Assuming any error on the evidentiary issues, we conclude that they were entirely harmless. See Mercury Cas. Co. v. Flores, 870 So.2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

The trial court's rulings regarding the accident report privilege were correct. See Alexander v. Penske Logistics, Inc., 867 So.2d 418 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). There was no fundamental error relating to the unobjected-to portions of the plaintiff's closing argument, see Murphy v. Int'l Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 2000), and the rulings on the objected-to portions of closing argument were within the court's discretion. We find no merit to the argument that the verdict is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Burgess Transp., Inc. v. Arostegui

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 11, 2004
882 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Burgess Transp., Inc. v. Arostegui

Case Details

Full title:BURGESS TRANSPORTATION, INC., a Florida Corporation, Underwriters…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 11, 2004

Citations

882 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)