From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matulonis v. Reading Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 16, 1965
207 A.2d 791 (Pa. 1965)

Opinion

January 6, 1965.

March 16, 1965.

Appeals — Interlocutory order — Order denying new trial — Quashing appeal.

An order denying a motion for a new trial is an interlocutory, nonappealable order; and an appeal from such an order in a case in which no judgment has been entered on the verdict must be quashed.

Before BELL, C. J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

Appeal, No. 175, Jan. T., 1964, from order of Court of Common Pleas No. 3 of Philadelphia County, Sept. T., 1959, No. 2714, in case of Frank Matulonis v. Reading Railroad Company. Appeal quashed.

Trespass for personal injuries. Before McCLANAGHAN, J.

Verdict entered for defendant, plaintiff's motion for new trial refused. Plaintiff appealed.

Aloysius J. Staud, with him Fine, Staud Silverman, for appellant. Norman Paul Harvey, with him Charles Robert Bernsee, and Liebert, Harvey, Herting Short, for appellee.


Appellant filed an action of trespass against appellee to recover for injuries allegedly sustained as the result of appellee's negligence. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for appellee. Appellant moved for a new trial in the court below, and, after denial of his motion, appealed to this court.

Appellee filed a motion to quash the appeal for the reason that appellant had failed to comply with the rules of this court relative to the service and filing of briefs. We ordered that motion to be argued at the time of oral argument on the merits. We reach neither the motion to quash nor the merits, since the appeal must be quashed for another reason. An appeal to this court in these circumstances lies from the judgment entered on the verdict of the jury and not from the order denying the new trial motion. Since no judgment was entered on the jury's verdict, the appeal is premature and must be quashed and the record remanded to the court below without prejudice to appellant's right to take judgment on the verdict, and to appeal therefrom to the proper court. Denmon v. Rhodes, 416 Pa. 568, 207 A.2d 860 (1965).

Appeal quashed and record remanded.


Summaries of

Matulonis v. Reading Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 16, 1965
207 A.2d 791 (Pa. 1965)
Case details for

Matulonis v. Reading Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:Matulonis, Appellant v. Reading Railroad Company

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 16, 1965

Citations

207 A.2d 791 (Pa. 1965)
207 A.2d 791

Citing Cases

White v. Rosenberry

The second appeal is from the refusal of the court below to permit the filing of a motion for a new trial…

Matulonis v. Reading Railroad Co.

We quashed the appeal as premature, inasmuch as no judgment had been entered on the verdict of the jury.…