Summary
In Denmon v. Rhodes, 416 Pa. 568, 207 A.2d 860, we said: "As stated in the footnote in Menyo v. Sphar, 409 Pa. 223, 224, 186 A.2d 9: 'Too many members of the Bar mistakenly believe that the appeal is from an Order which dismissed their motion for a new trial, instead of from a judgment which was entered on the verdict: Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 384 Pa. 335, 121 A.2d 84. Compare also Hazle Township Supervisors' Appeal, 406 Pa. 641, 180 A.2d 232.
Summary of this case from Gelzhiser v. FisherOpinion
January 11, 1965.
March 16, 1965.
Appeals — Appealable orders — Interlocutory orders — Order dismissing new trial motion — Failure to enter judgment on verdict — Quashing appeal.
An appeal from an order dismissing a motion for a new trial, where no judgment has been entered on the verdict, must be quashed as an appeal from an interlocutory order.
Before BELL, C. J., MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.
Appeal, No. 96, Jan. T., 1965, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, Feb. T., 1963, No. 67, in case of Augustus Denmon, Natalie Denmon, Richard Denmon, a minor, et al. v. Albert Rhodes. Appeal quashed.
Trespass for personal injuries and property damage. Before RILEY, J.
Verdict for defendant and against plaintiffs; motion by plaintiffs for a new trial refused. Plaintiffs appealed.
G. Clinton Fogwell, Jr., with him Melva L. Mueller, John W. Wellman, and Reilly and Fogwell, for appellants. James E. O'Neill, Jr., with him Rogers O'Neill, for appellee.
Plaintiffs sued defendant in trespass. The jury returned a verdict for defendant. Plaintiffs appealed to this Court from an Order of the lower Court which dismissed their motion for a new trial.
As stated in the footnote in Menyo v. Sphar, 409 Pa. 223, 224, 186 A.2d 9:
"Too many members of the Bar mistakenly believe that the appeal is from an Order which dismissed their motion for a new trial, instead of from a judgment which was entered on the verdict: Simpson v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 384 Pa. 335, 121 A.2d 84. Compare also Hazle Township Supervisors' Appeal, 406 Pa. 641, 180 A.2d 232."
The appeal is premature since no Judgment was entered in the lower Court, and for this reason the appeal must be quashed.
The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County without prejudice to the right to enter a Judgment on the verdict.
Appeal quashed and record remanded.