From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Zadan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1991
174 A.D.2d 65 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 16, 1991

Robert H. Straus (Robert J. Saltzman of counsel), for petitioner.

Michael Edward Zadan, respondent pro se.


On May 13, 1991, the respondent was convicted, upon his guilty plea, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, of submission of a false document in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, a felony.

We have previously held that 18 U.S.C. § 1001 is essentially similar to New York Penal Law § 175.35, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony. (Matter of Krup, 136 A.D.2d 351; Matter of Mydanick, 78 A.D.2d 339, lv denied 53 N.Y.2d 604).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the petitioner's motion is granted and the respondent's request for a hearing is denied. The respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

MANGANO, P.J., THOMPSON, BRACKEN, KUNZEMAN and EIBER, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent Michael Edward Zadan, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall promptly comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys ( 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent Michael Edward Zadan is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.


Summaries of

Matter of Zadan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 16, 1991
174 A.D.2d 65 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Zadan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL EDWARD ZADAN, an Attorney, Respondent. GRIEVANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1991

Citations

174 A.D.2d 65 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
577 N.Y.S.2d 451

Citing Cases

Matter of Zumbo

35 are analogous for attorney disciplinary purposes. The First Department has so held repeatedly (see, Matter…

In re Matter of Shepherd

The respondent's admitted conduct establishes that he violated 18 USC § 1001 ( see Matter of Hug, 10 AD3d…