From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MATTER OF KRUP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1988
136 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

April 25, 1988

Gary Casella (Leslie S. Evans of counsel), for petitioner.

Ira Searle Krup, respondent pro se.


The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on October 29, 1974, under the name I.S. Krup.

On April 15, 1987, the respondent was found guilty, after trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, of nine counts involving violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 1002, and violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201 (g).

On September 23, 1987, the respondent was sentenced on the first count to three years' imprisonment with confinement for a period of 179 days, and execution of the remainder of the jail sentence suspended, and to probation for a period of three years, and was directed to pay a fine in the amount of $10,000. As to four other counts, the respondent was sentenced to the same term of imprisonment to run concurrently with the term imposed as to the first count and directed to pay fines totaling $2,000. As to the remaining four counts, the imposition of sentence was suspended for a period of two years and the respondent was placed on probation for a period of two years commencing upon his release from the confinement imposed on count one, the term of probation to run concurrently with the probation imposed in the first count.

Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, a Federal felony, has been held to constitute a felony under the New York State Penal Law § 175.35 (see, Matter of Mydanick, 78 A.D.2d 339, lv denied 53 N.Y.2d 604; Matter of Cahn, 87 A.D.2d 1014, lv denied 56 N.Y.2d 536; Matter of Silverblatt, 113 A.D.2d 1). Penal Law § 175.35, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, is a class E felony.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), upon his conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State.

Accordingly, the petitioner's motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and it is directed that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith. The respondent's tender of his resignation is not accepted.

MOLLEN, P.J., MANGANO, BRACKEN, BROWN and KOOPER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

MATTER OF KRUP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1988
136 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

MATTER OF KRUP

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IRA SEARLE KRUP (Admitted as I.S. KRUP), an Attorney…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
527 N.Y.S.2d 440

Citing Cases

Matter of Zadan

We have previously held that 18 U.S.C. § 1001 is essentially similar to New York Penal Law § 175.35, offering…

Matter of Gottlieb

The respondent's conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 is analogous to a conviction under Penal Law § 175.35,…