From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Town of Camillus v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Summary

recognizing principle, but determining it did not apply

Summary of this case from King v. Galluzzo Equipment Excavating, Inc.

Opinion

May 11, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Donovan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Denman and Davis, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition and the complaint on the ground that the Town of Camillus lacks standing to bring either the proceeding or the action.


Summaries of

Matter of Town of Camillus v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1990
161 A.D.2d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

recognizing principle, but determining it did not apply

Summary of this case from King v. Galluzzo Equipment Excavating, Inc.
Case details for

Matter of Town of Camillus v. White

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TOWN OF CAMILLUS, Appellant, v. FRANKLIN E. WHITE, as New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 11, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 1149 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
555 N.Y.S.2d 957

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.

That Court then cited a number of non-New York cases, as well as Luciano v Garvey Volkswagen ( 131 A.D.2d…

SONNENSCHEIN NATH ROSENTHAL LLP v. KONZERN

Notwithstanding plaintiff's failure to properly serve defendant pursuant to BCL § 307[b][2], contrary to…