From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Robertson v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 2001
279 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 4, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Kuyuar Robertson, Albion, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. To the extent that petitioner raises a substantial evidence issue herein, we find that the misbehavior report, together with the positive results of the urinalysis tests and the hearing testimony, constitute substantial evidence to support the charge of drug use (see, Matter of Pollard v. Duncan, 274 A.D.2d 720). Contrary to petitioner's assertions, the evidence sufficiently demonstrated that the drug testing was performed in accordance with applicable procedures and the chain of custody was adequately established (see, 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e]; Matter of Terry v. Goord, 272 A.D.2d 701). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Robertson v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 2001
279 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Matter of Robertson v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KUYUAR ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 4, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 891

Citing Cases

Matter of Jackson v. Portuondo

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using…

Campbell v. Goord

In view of this deviation from the requirements of 7 NYCRR 1020.4 (d) (4), we conclude that the determination…