From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Terry v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 2000
272 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 11, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Charles Terry, Albion, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Graffeo, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

After submitting a urine sample which tested positive for the presence of opiates, petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with using a controlled substance. Following a tier III hearing, he was found guilty of the charge. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report and positive test results, together with the testimony presented at the hearing, provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Aviles v. Selsky, 264 A.D.2d 883). We also reject petitioner's claim that the urinalysis sample was not handled properly. The evidence sufficiently demonstrated that the drug testing was performed in accordance with applicable procedures and that the chain of custody was adequately established (see, 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e];Matter of Selby v. Coombe, 249 A.D.2d 597). Petitioner's remaining arguments have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Graffeo, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Terry v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 11, 2000
272 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Terry v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHARLES TERRY, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 11, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 909

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Selsky

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the use of a controlled…

McMillan v. Goord

ioner was the subject of two misbehavior reports, each of which charged him with violating the prison…