Opinion
June 2, 1997
Appeal from the Family Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The record does not support the appellant's assertion that the presentment agency failed to turn over Rosario material ( see, People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286), as required by Family Court Act § 331.4 (1) (a). The presentment agency's representation that all Rosario material had previously been provided was sufficient to obviate the need for further inquiry ( cf., People v. Poole, 48 N.Y.2d 144, 149; People v. Farrell, 207 A.D.2d 560), and the appellant's claim of the existence of notes taken by the State Park police officer amounted to nothing more than pure speculation ( see, Matter of Michael R., 223 A.D.2d 465; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 217 A.D.2d 409; People v. Damaceno, 214 A.D.2d 464).
Mangano, P.J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.