Opinion
December 10, 1998
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits. "Determination of whether a claimant left his or her employment for good cause raises a factual issue to be determined by the Board and such determination will not be disturbed so long as it is based upon substantial evidence" ( Matter of Schwab [Marie — Sweeney], 233 A.D.2d 732). Although job dissatisfaction and criticism of an employee's work performance by a supervisor does not generally constitute good cause for leaving one's employment ( see, Matter of Baxter [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 623), here the Board credited claimant's testimony that, after her supervisor raged at her regarding her work performance, he advanced toward her in a threatening manner causing her to flee the office out of fear for her personal safety. "`[E]ach factual situation must be reviewed to determine if the employee has reasonable grounds to conclude that his personal safety is being endangered and that the conduct complained of is such as to inculcate in the employee a genuine fear'" ( Matter of Hughes [Hartnett], 198 A.D.2d 647, 648, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 751, quoting Matter of Fried [Ross], 54 A.D.2d 521). Inasmuch as there is record evidence to support the Board's decision in this case, it will not be disturbed ( see, Matter of Lyman [National Tractor Trailer School — Sweeney], 247 A.D.2d 812).
Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.