From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Baxter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 6, 1997
244 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 6, 1997

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Claimant resigned from her employment as the office manager of a law firm after one of her employers criticized her job performance. Substantial evidence supports the ruling of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant left her employment for personal, noncompelling reasons. Criticism of an employee's work by his or her employer does not constitute good cause for leaving one's employment (see, Matter of Feng Yen Yang [Sweeney], 233 A.D.2d 656; Matter of Lucas [Dominican Sisters — Sweeney], 213 A.D.2d 960). The conflict in testimony between claimant's assertion that she was fired and that of the employer who asserted that claimant voluntarily resigned presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Board (see, Matter of Bradley [Hudacs], 190 A.D.2d 949).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Baxter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 6, 1997
244 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Baxter

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LAURA M. BAXTER, Appellant. JOHN E. SWEENEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 623 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 921

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Viruet

Although we recognize that the determination of whether an employee voluntarily left his or her employment…

Matter of Perkins

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision that claimant was entitled…