From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of McLaughlin v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 10, 1998
253 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 10, 1998


Petitioner, a police officer, allegedly injured his knee when he slipped on loose gravel and stones while responding to a call of underage drinking at the railroad tracks. Petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the ground that the injury resulted from petitioner's own misstep and did not constitute an "accident" within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. The record reveals that petitioner had been at the site numerous times before in the course of his duties for similar calls and was familiar with the terrain. Furthermore, petitioner already had taken several steps away from his vehicle before he slipped. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination of respondent Comptroller that petitioner's injury did not result from a sudden or unexpected event ( see, Matter of Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees, 57 N.Y.2d 1010; Matter of Minchak v. McCall, 246 A.D.2d 952).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of McLaughlin v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 10, 1998
253 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of McLaughlin v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TERENCE McLAUGHLIN, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 10, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 406

Citing Cases

Matter of Dean v. McCall

At the hearing, he indicated that the injury occurred when he lost his footing in an area comprised of half…

In re Grutzner

He was unable to explain why the incident occurred. Under these circumstances, respondent reasonably…