From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Minchak v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 29, 1998
246 A.D.2d 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

Decided January 29, 1998


Petitioner was employed as a police officer for the Town of Orangetown in Rockland County. On September 3, 1977, petitioner responded to a complaint about a gas leak at a local residence. As petitioner inspected the house and shined his flashlight on the second floor looking for an open window, he stepped off a retaining wall which he did not know was there and injured his knee. After a hearing, petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the ground that petitioner did not suffer an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 63. This proceeding ensued.

Our review of the record reveals that there is substantial evidence to support respondent's determination. Petitioner testified that inspecting a house when called upon to do so was part of his duty and that he had done so on thousands of occasions. In view of the fact that the incident occurred as the result of petitioner's ordinary employment activity, it was rational for respondent to conclude that petitioner did not suffer an "accident" within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 63 (see, Matter of Cadiz v. McCall, 236 A.D.2d 766) and that the incident was the product of petitioner's own misstep (see, e.g., Matter of Klug v. McCall, 224 A.D.2d 818; Matter of Seim v. Regan, 191 A.D.2d 931, 932).

Furthermore, we reject petitioner's contention that it was error for a Hearing Officer other than the one who presided over the hearing to render the determination. The resignation of the presiding Hearing Officer prior to rendering a determination made it necessary for respondent to appoint a substitute (see, e.g., Matter of Kelly v. Duffy, 144 A.D.2d 792, 793) and, in any event, petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he was substantially prejudiced thereby (see, Matter of Morrisey v. New York State Local Police Firemen Retirement Sys., 239 A.D.2d 635, 636; see also, Matter of Rumors Disco v. New York State Liq. Auth., 212 A.D.2d 796, 797).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, White and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Minchak v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 29, 1998
246 A.D.2d 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Minchak v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EUGENE MINCHAK, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1998

Citations

246 A.D.2d 952 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 863

Citing Cases

Slagle v. McCall

After a hearing on petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits, respondent…

Penkalski v. McCall

In chasing a suspect, petitioner was certainly engaged in police work and, in the performance of this work,…