From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kantor v. William Armstrong Pub. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

July, 1932.


Assuming that the claimant stepped out of his employment when he went to get a drink of lemonade ( Matter of Clark v. Voorhees, 231 N.Y. 14), he was within the course of his employment when ascending the stairway leading to his employer's premises to perform the duties of his employment by a way provided by the employer. ( Ross v. Howieson, 232 N.Y. 604; Matter of Kowalek v. N.Y. Cons. R.R. Co., 229 id. 489.) The award should be affirmed. All concur. McNamee, J., not voting. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Kantor v. William Armstrong Pub. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Matter of Kantor v. William Armstrong Pub. Co.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MORTIMER KANTOR, Respondent, against WILLIAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Gallienne v. Company

The question is not what the employee is about to do, or has just been doing, but whether or not at the time…