From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ross v. Howieson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1922
134 N.E. 589 (N.Y. 1922)

Opinion

Argued January 10, 1922

Decided January 24, 1922

Charles D. Newton, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for appellant.

E.C. Sherwood, William B. Davis and Benjamin C. Loder for respondents.


Order of Appellate Division reversed on dissenting opinion of JOHN M. KELLOGG, P.J., below, and award of state industrial commission affirmed, with costs in this court and Appellate Division.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Ross v. Howieson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1922
134 N.E. 589 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for

Matter of Ross v. Howieson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of WINIFRED ROSS against HOWIESON et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 24, 1922

Citations

134 N.E. 589 (N.Y. 1922)
134 N.E. 589

Citing Cases

Claim of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.

Nor will the occurrence of the accident outside the precise bounds of the employee's usual activities bar…

Lindgren v. Tugboat Dalzellable, Inc.

This duty, long recognized by the admiralty courts, is not restricted to the exact situs of the labor but…