From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kalis v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1999
257 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

January 14, 1999.


Petitioner, a truck mechanic for a municipality, filed an application for accidental disability retirement benefits alleging that he was disabled because of injuries sustained in accidents occurring on May 22, 1992 and June 10, 1995. Petitioner's application was denied on the ground that the injuries resulted from petitioner's own missteps and did not constitute an "accident" within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. We confirm. With respect to the May 1992 incident, the record reveals that petitioner, who slipped on grease on a staircase leading to a repair pit where he changed truck fluids, had traversed this staircase before and was aware that it was not well lit and that grease occasionally would accumulate on the stairs. With respect to the June 1995 incident, the undisputed testimony was that petitioner successfully climbed up a wheeled aluminum stepladder and stepped off to repair a truck. The ladder had spring-loaded wheels, which locked when weight was placed on them. After petitioner completed his work and stepped onto the ladder to descend again, the ladder began to roll and petitioner fell. There was no evidence that the ladder was defective or that it malfunctioned, and respondent Comptroller ruled that the injury was caused by petitioner's own misstep or miscalculation in stepping on the ladder. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the determination of the Comptroller that petitioner's injuries did not result from a sudden or unexpected event ( see, Matter of Minchak v. McCall, 246 A.D.2d 952).

Although petitioner actually cited four separate incidents in support of his application, he limits his brief to arguments claiming that the May 1992 and June 1995 incidents were "accidents". Accordingly, we deem any arguments relating to the other two incidents to be abandoned ( see, Gibeault v. Home Ins. Co., 221 A.D.2d 826, 827, n 2).

Crew III, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Kalis v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 1999
257 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Kalis v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS J. KALIS, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1999

Citations

257 A.D.2d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 303

Citing Cases

Matter of Dean v. McCall

At the hearing, he indicated that the injury occurred when he lost his footing in an area comprised of half…

Matter of Burke v. New York St. Comptroller

nt while walking on a floor which she described as highly waxed and slippery, contends that respondent…