From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Homer v. Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 23, 1979
71 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Summary

In Matter of Homer v Board of Elections of County of Cortland (71 A.D.2d 970, mot for lv to app den 48 N.Y.2d 601) there were 16 signatures on one sheet of a designating petition for a candidate seeking a place on the primary ballot of the Democratic Party for the office of county legislator in the September 11, 1979 primary election.

Summary of this case from Roe v. Palmer

Opinion

August 23, 1979


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered August 20, 1979 in Cortland County, which granted petitioner's application, in a proceeding under section 16-102 Elec. of the Election Law, seeking to declare invalid the designating petition designating appellant as a candidate of the Democratic Party for the office of County Legislator in the September 11, 1979 Primary Election. A designating petition on behalf of appellant, seeking a place on the primary ballot of the Democratic Party for the office of County Legislator, was filed with the Board of Elections of Cortland County (board) on July 26, 1979. Petitioner filed objections to the designating petition alleging, inter alia, that Joseph Rosato, who witnessed page 3 of the petition, was not an enrolled member of the Democratic Party as required by subdivision 2 of section 6-132 Elec. of the Election Law. The board ruled the petition valid and petitioner commenced this proceeding. Special Term granted petitioner's application and directed the board to reject the designating petition. This appeal ensued. The sole issue is whether Joseph Rosato who, on February 13, 1979, filed a printed form with the board changing his enrollment from "Blank", denoting no political party affiliation, to "Democrat", was an enrolled Democrat when he witnessed the signatures on appellant's designating petition, as required by subdivision 2 of section 6-132 Elec. of the Election Law. We hold that he was not and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of Special Term. Pursuant to section 5-304 Elec. of the Election Law, a registered voter's change of enrollment from not enrolled in any party to enrolled in a particular party does not become effective until the first Tuesday following the next succeeding general election. Accordingly, Rosato's enrollment as a Democrat will not become effective until after the November, 1979 general election (see Matter of Sims v. Board of Elections of Erie County, 22 N.Y.2d 755; cf. Matter of Sharpton v. Previte, 64 A.D.2d 939; Matter of Schwimmer v. Power, 21 A.D.2d 835). Rosato, therefore, was not enrolled in the same party as the voters qualified to sign the petition, as required by subdivision 2 of section 6-132 Elec. of the Election Law, and the signatures he witnessed were properly declared invalid by Special Term (see Matter of Sims v. Board of Elections of Erie County, supra). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Staley, Jr., and Main, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J., not taking part.


Summaries of

Matter of Homer v. Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 23, 1979
71 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

In Matter of Homer v Board of Elections of County of Cortland (71 A.D.2d 970, mot for lv to app den 48 N.Y.2d 601) there were 16 signatures on one sheet of a designating petition for a candidate seeking a place on the primary ballot of the Democratic Party for the office of county legislator in the September 11, 1979 primary election.

Summary of this case from Roe v. Palmer
Case details for

Matter of Homer v. Fitzgerald

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EARLE L. HOMER, Respondent, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 23, 1979

Citations

71 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Roe v. Palmer

The majority's ruling kept the candidate's name from the ballot. In Matter of Homer v Board of Elections of…